Death to the BHAG

Recently I read a post where the author used the term, BHAG.  My stomach turned when I read the post.  I thought of years ago when I attended a big company meeting listening to my senior leaders use that term, BHAG.  They spoke like they invented the term.  The BHAG will lead us to success.  For a period of time BHAG was the word at my organization. 

I admit it. At the time I loved it.  “Bring on the BHAG!”

Now I wish the BHAG to die a quick death.

bhagWhat is a BHAG you ask … Big Hairy Audacious Goal

Goal setting is important for leaders.  We know this.  Yet, these days I stop short of the BHAG.  If I never hear the term again, I will be a happy person. 

As I strive to be a better leader, I want to understand why the term bothers me so much these days.  Am I being too harsh on the BHAG?  I do love the word, audacious.  I think not, but let me do a Google Search and see what hits I get for “problem with BHAG”. 

Well, 2,720,000 results for my search - really?!  BHAG has its own Wikipedia site.  I see references to the original authors of the term, Jim Collins and Jerry Porras – the authors of one of my favorite business books, Built to Last.  I see other bloggers writing on the topic of the BHAG.  I do not know if most are yea or nay on the BHAG and I have no time to read the countless sites. 

Fortunately the first search result turns out to be the only one I need to read.  It is from one of the best on leadership and business success, Tom Peters.  His post is titled, From BHAG to CCAG. Or From Big Hairy Audacious Goal to Clear and Compelling Audacious Goal

Tom keeps the audacious term … marked by originality and verve; daring, bold.  Yea, I do like that word. 

I invite you to read Tom’s post here.  I share Tom’s view as it gets to the heart of my problem with the BHAG.  A stated BHAG is not enough as often the leader is more interested in stating the goal (with much fanfare) than clearly articulating how we will get there. The path is not important, just get me there. 

The bigger, the hairier, with extra audacious sauce … the better the goal. 

This is wrong.  I know it now.  Those I work with and all those who no longer work for my company know it too.  Yes, an organization needs goals.  Goals that indeed stretch and grow the organization.  Yet goals need clarity and involvement.  We must take that big goal and create the path to get there.  That is leadership.

If leaders turn a blind eye to everything but the BHAG then an organization can behave in such a way as to get there under any circumstance … and lose sense of self along the way.  Once one states a BHAG, the most important step is not the last step where one reaches the BHAG.  The most important step is the first one. 

I have learned this lesson the hard way, but ultimately the only way to learn … from life experiences.    I will continue to have goals for myself and my team.  I do dream of returning to a spot where we discuss big goals.  Even audacious goals.  Yet always clear and compelling.   WeMoveTogether. 

goal setting steps

Thursday Thought – On Blogging

Note: Each Thursday I will post a little something to inspire us to finish the week strong.  These posts will be either a quote, a piece of art, or short video.  Congratulations, you made it over the hump and let’s finish the week together.

For my first Thursday Thought I am drawn to the decision to create and continue with a blog.  I invite you to watch this short video by Seth Godin and Tom Peters discussing the power of the blog.  Let your voice be heard!

Explicit Hiring Criteria

I get this from Tom Peters the author of the Classic Management Book, “In Search Of Excellence” as well as many other terrific books and writings. Tom is very active on twitter and his postings and retweets are not to be missed. I suggest you check him out on twitter and follow him. @tom_peters.

A recent twitter post speaks to hiring criteria. Tom spells it out for his criteria:

Enthusiasm. Passion. Energy. Engagement. Curiosity. Breadth. Smile. Thoughtfulness. “We”. Listening Intensity.

For the leader this has many implications. For one, imagine yourself as a leader of a group of folks who largely possess the above traits. Such a leader can not fake it, this group would demand a strong leader who also possesses the above criteria, but also has the ability to lead such a team.

One attribute of such a leader is the ability to get the hell out-of-the-way. A group with these traits, once they understand what needs to get done, will find the way to get it done. How many managers can effectively find the balance to step in and out as needed?

Another implication is a group with these traits may stand out in a company that may not quite be comfortable with this approach. The energy, the questions asked (why do you do it that way?), the passion involved … this can be very different, but exactly what is needed.

Imagine a leader with these qualities as well as a team of dedicated employees with these attributes. Wow – truly we move together.